埃克斯特论文代写 交易成本理论

当组织与交易成本理论的分析,主要有三个问题基于采访经理:知识的分享来自国际办事处只有因为有一个项目,澳大利亚当地的办事处没有专业知识,另一方面国内员工搬到澳大利亚各地办事处没有交叉的教育,但作为一个削减成本的方式。第三个问题是,该公司没有集中足够的客户维护过去,直到最近它被发现的重要性,维护良好的客户关系和沟通在项目以外的项目。

根本问题的三个问题确认以前公司是他们太被动了。作为一个公司,是非常依赖于顾客,它已经完成试图减少交易成本,从我的角度来看应该不是一个组织的优先级,除非它是一个非营利性的组织。有两个限制传统的交易成本理论。首先,它本质上是一个一党分析成本最小化。它只关注交易成本的部分,但忽视交流合作伙伴之间的独立性,所示垂直整合交易成本分析方法。第二,交易成本过于强调国际组织交换关系的结构分析(亚茨,1993)。然而,一个成功的商业模式应该发现联合价值在交易过程中,而不是单个公司成本最小化。

埃克斯特论文代写 交易成本理论

When the organization is analysed with the theory of transaction cost, there are three main problems based on the interview with the manager: The sharing of knowledge from international offices has only come about because there was a project that the local Australia offices have no expertise in, on the other hand the domestic employees have been moved around Australia offices not as a matter of cross education, but as a manner of cost cutting. The third problem is that the company has not focussed enough on customer maintenance in the past, only recently has its been realized the importance of maintaining of good clients relation and communication during the projects and also outside projects.

The underlying problem to the three issues identified previously of this company is that they are too reactive. As a company that is tremendously dependent on the customers, what it has been done was trying to minimise the transaction cost, which from my perspective should not be the priority of one organization except it is a non-profit organization. There are two limitations about the traditional transaction cost theory. First, it is essentially a single-party analysis of cost minimization. It only focus on the transaction cost part, but neglect the independence between exchange partners, shown in analysis of transaction cost approach to vertical integration. Second, the transaction cost overemphasizes the structural analysis of inter organizational exchange relationships (Zajac, 1993). However, A successful business mode is supposed to discover the joint value during the transaction process, rather than single firm cost minimization.