英国莱斯特论文代写:穷人缺乏就业资源

Keywords:英国莱斯特论文代写:穷人缺乏就业资源

美国和澳大利亚在穷人缺乏就业资源这一社会问题上的相似之处是，它们都经历了衰退，导致失业增加，导致贫困增加。我认为他们分享这一点是因为国家之间做生意，当一个国家的经济出现转折时，它会影响其他国家。在这两个地方，政府都参与到这个问题中来，为需要帮助的个人提供帮助，但是这两个地方的人们仍然缺乏获得工作所需的资源，比如获得技术和交通。他们可能会分享这一点，因为他们都是发达国家，要想成为发达国家，政府需要参与其中，但他们不能解决所有问题。两国的另一个相似之处是，贫困主要影响内陆城市，这是工作转移/停工的结果。我认为这是因为，正如前面提到的，两国都经历了工业化的变革，影响了商业的稳定性和区位。这些相似之处也有不同之处，其中之一是贫困比例;美国的贫困率是24%，澳大利亚是19%(基本生活必需品，第10页)。这些百分比相差并不大，我认为这是因为两个国家都很发达，但都经历了影响人民的经济变革;这种差异可能与这些国家在发生经济事件之前的经济形势有关。另一个区别是如何确定贫困线;在美国，它是由生活水平和缺乏商品和服务决定的，而主流社会往往认为这些是理所当然的，这一点一直在被评估(美国的贫困)。在澳大利亚，有不同的方法来确定这一点，但没有商定的措施。虽然定义各不相同，但我认为很难定义什么是贫穷，因为有太多的变量使其难以确定和查明，所以我认为这种差异只是来自于不同的贫穷方法。另一个不同的定义是在美国，当个人缺乏资源或无法获得改善其生活所需的资源时，称为相对贫困;在澳大利亚，这被称为参与贫困。这些定义基本相同，只是术语不同。我认为他们都有一个术语来描述这一点，因为缺乏改善生活能力的个人并不符合贫困的典型定义，但他们确实缺乏就业所需的资源，而这些资源通常被认为是理所当然的。如前所述，城市是受贫困影响最大的地区，但农村社区也受到影响;在美国在美国，移民到这里的少数民族往往生活在城市，而在澳大利亚，土著居民往往生活在农村地区。这种差异可能来自不想与其他组混合的组。另一个不同是二战后，美国的工作岗位从城市转移到郊区，这让很多人处于劣势，而澳大利亚战后出现了经济繁荣.
英国莱斯特论文代写：穷人缺乏就业资源
A similarity between the United States and Australia in reference to the social problem of poor lacking access to employment resources was, they both went through a recession which lead to an increase in unemployment, resulting in an increase in poverty. I think they share this because countries do business together and when the economy takes a turn in one country, it affects other countries. In both places, the government is involved in this issue, by providing assistance to individuals who need it, but people in both places still lack the resources needed to obtain a job, like access to technology and transportation. They might share this because they are both well developed countries and to be well developed, government needs to be somewhat involved but they cannot solve everything. Another similarity in both countries is poverty mostly affects the inner cities, which is a consequence of job relocation/shutdown. I think this is so because as mentioned, both countries went through a change in industrialization, which affected business stability and location. With these similarities there are also differences, one of them being the poverty percentages; in the U.S. the poverty rate is 24%, in Australia it is 19% (The Bare Necessities, p.10). These percentages aren’t really that far apart and I think this is because both countries are well developed but have both went through economic changes that affected the people; this difference could be associated with economic situation in the countries before economic events. Another difference is how the poverty line is determined; in the U.S. it is determined by the standard of living and the lack of goods and services that mainstream society tends to take for granted, which is constantly being evaluated (Poverty in the United States). In Australia, there are different methods for determining this, but there is no agreed upon measure. Although the definitions vary, I think it is hard to define what poverty is because there are so many variables which make it hard to determine and pinpoint, so I think this difference just comes from different approaches to poverty. Another definition variance is in the U.S., when an individual lacks resources or access to resources need to better their lives is referred to as relative poverty; in Australia, this is referred to as participation poverty. These definitions are basically the same, just with different terms. I think they both have a term for this because individuals that lack the ability to improve their lives do not fit into the typical definition of poverty, but they do lack resources needed for employment and that are typically taken for granted. As mentioned earlier, cities are the areas mostly affected by poverty, but rural communities are also affected; in the U.S., minorities, who have migrated here, tend to live in cities and in Australia, indigenous people tend to live in rural areas. This difference could be from groups not wanting to mix with other groups. Another difference was post World War II, when jobs in America moved from the cities to the suburbs, which left a lot of people at a disadvantage, and after the war in Australia, there was an economic boom