英国谢菲尔德哈兰姆代写论文:康德的论断
Keywords:英国谢菲尔德哈兰姆代写论文:康德的论断
康德认为的对范畴命令的违反。科斯加德反对康德的论断，即在门口给凶手错误的答案是错误的，他认为在这种情况下说谎并不违反范畴命令。她进一步论述了对门口的凶手撒谎是一种责任，并进一步扩展了她的推理。Korsgaard提出了一个两个层次的理论第一种形式的定言令式在任何情况下都适用第二种只有当一个人在保护自己或他人免受邪恶时才适用。为了为康德的第一个绝对命令辩护，科尔斯加德认为，从康德的观点来看，当向门口的凶手撒谎时，将支配行为的准则或原则普遍化，实际上是允许的。她认为绝对命令的第一种形式在谋杀者隐瞒其谋杀意图的情况下是不受侵犯的。她解释说，如果站在门口的凶手不知道收信人知道他们是凶手，那么凶手会认为收信人会认为他们只是“想知道朋友在哪里的友好邻居”。换句话说，她相信你可以将一个格言普遍化，在这个格言中，你对邪恶的反应是通过欺骗来挫败邪恶，而邪恶的人并不知道你知道他的计划。邪恶的人，或者谋杀者，没有意识到你正处于使用这条格言的位置;因此，你可以利用这一点，而不会挫伤你成功摆脱谎言的目的。
英国谢菲尔德哈兰姆代写论文:康德的论断
violation of the Categorical Imperatives according to Kant. Korsgaard goes against Kant’s assertion that it is wrong to give the murderer at the door the wrong answer arguing that it does not violate the Categorical Imperatives to lie in these circumstances. She further discusses that it is a duty to lie to the murderer at the door and expands on her reasoning. Korsgaard comes up with a two level theory on which the first form of the Categorical Imperative would apply under all circumstances and the second only when one is defending oneself or another against evil.In order to defend Kant’s first Categorical Imperative, Korsgaard argues that it is in fact permissible from a Kantian point of view to universalize the maxim, or principle that governs action, when lying to the murderer at the door. She argues that the first form of the Categorical Imperative is not violated in the case where the murderer makes a secret of their murderous intensions. She explains that if the murderer at the door does not know that the recipient knows they are murderers, that the murderer will think that the recipient will believe that they are just a “friendly neighbor trying to find out where their friend is” for example. In other words, she believes you can universalize a maxim in which you respond to evil with an effort to frustrate evil through deception, where the evil person is unaware that you are aware of his plan. The evil person, or murderer, does not realize that you are in the position in which you would use this maxim; therefore you would be able to use this without frustrating your purpose to successfully get away with your lie.
