英国巴斯大学论文代写:自然法则

Keywords:英国巴斯大学论文代写:自然法则

哈特指出，人类的某些条件是不变的，他称之为自然法则的最小内容，比如人类的脆弱性。如果我们忽视这些社会学事实，这无异于自杀。但是，除了这些事实之外，社会还面临一个选择，那就是采用什么样的规则来保护我们不受人类境况bb0的影响。哈特似乎断言，既然一个社会的发展是一场集体的冒险，那么一个社会为维护和进步而采取的价值观就构成了某种共同的道德。这并不意味着一个社会接受和保留的准则是实现社会保全的逻辑上必须的准则。然而，它们在维护社会凝聚力方面起着重要作用。因此，他不会接受德夫林的比喻，即违背道德规范是对社会的背叛。道德的改变可能会导致摩擦，但不一定会导致社会的崩溃。哈特也采用了伤害原则，但否认同意可以作为减轻罪行的因素。自然法则同样，公开的不道德行为可能对他人有害，因此可能受到法律的谴责，而私下的行为不应成为法律问题。他的理由是，第一个是合法的预防伤害，第二个是社会意志对个人的强制执行。哈特认为家长式作风是合理的，但并没有加强道德本身。
英国巴斯大学论文代写:自然法则
Hart notes that there are certain constants of the human condition, which he terms the minimum content of natural law, such as the vulnerability of human beings. If we disregard these sociological facts it would be tantamount to suicide. But beyond these facts, society is faced with a choice of what rules to adopt in order to protect us from the frailties of the human condition[9]. Hart seems to assert that since the development of a society is a collective odyssey, the values that a society has adopted for its preservation and progress constitute a shared morality of sorts. This does not mean that the norms that a society has accepted and retained are ones that are logically necessary for the achievement of social preservation. However, they are instrumental in the maintenance of social cohesion. For this reason he would not accept Devlin’s analogy of deviation from moral norms with treason against society[10]. It may be that a change in morality can result in friction, but it need not result in the collapse of society.Hart also adopts the harm principle, but denies that consent can be used as a mitigating factor. Equally, immoral acts in public may be harmful to others and, as such, open to legal censure, whereas acts in private should not be a matter for the law. His justification is that while the first is the legitimate prevention of harm, the latter is the enforcement of the societal will over the individual. Hart finds paternalism justified, but not enforce morality per se.