英国巴斯大学论文代写:人类观念
Keywords:英国巴斯大学论文代写:人类观念
思想是人类观念已经被代表。他们不是独立存在等待思想的抽象概念。一个想法的思维过程涉及表达。因此,思想是人类观念,不能独立存在的一种概念化的方式即本质上表达。一个想法是写作的实质而表达形式。这种物质形状的形式和形状的物质形式。因此不能独立存在,都有一个互补的关系。实质上隐含的是,没有面无表情的想法。因此思想从来没有独立存在的一个表达式因为概念化一个想法的唯一方法是一个表达式。虽然法律创建一个fictionary之间思想和表达但本质上就不可能有unexpressionless想法[28]。法律本质的观点想法抽象或笼统,因此有别于表达式是固定在一个中等[29]。尽管有很多司法声明二分法的存在,但没有一个法院连贯地提出的定义和范围“想法”或“表达”或两者之间的界定线[30]。二分法已经表示在许多情况下,“想法表达式[31]”或“潜在的思想[32]”,但没有走到明显区分差别也没有提供概念清晰的条款。此外,各种各样的术语使用旨在提供一个在这方面缺乏透明度。
英国巴斯大学论文代写:人类观念
Ideas are human conceptions that have been represented. They are not abstract conceptions that exist independently waiting to be thought. The process of thinking of an idea involves giving it expression. Therefore, ideas are human conceptions and cannot exist independently of a way of conceptualizing i.e. essentially the expression. An idea is the substance of a writing whereas the expression is the form. The substance shapes the form and the form shapes the substance. Hence both cannot exist independently and have a complementary relationship. In essence what is implied is that there are no expressionless ideas. Therefore ideas never exist independently of an expression since the only way to conceptualize an idea is an expression. Though law creates a fictionary line between ideas and expression but in essence there can be no unexpressionless ideas [28] . Law in essences views ideas as abstractions or generalities and therefore distinct from expressions which are fixed in a medium [29] . Though there have been many judicial pronouncements upon the existence of the dichotomy, but yet none of the courts have coherently put forth the definition and scope of “idea” or “expression” or the demarcating line between the two [30] . The dichotomy has been signified in many cases as “ideas behind expressions [31] ” or “underlying ideas [32] “, but have neither gone onto clearly distinguishing the difference nor provided conceptual clarity with respect to the terms. Furthermore, the variety of terminologies that have been used seeks to provide a lack of clarity in this field.
