英国巴斯大学论文代写:暴君
Keywords:英国巴斯大学论文代写:暴君
洛克认为，当国王成为暴君时，反抗是可以接受的(Ashcraft, 1980, 1999)。当统治者“制定的不是法律，而是他的意志和统治”，将他的行动和政治权力导向个人目标，而不是促进共同利益时，暴政就发生了(TII.xviii.199)。暴君使用“没有权威的武力”，事实上已经超过了法律的限制。在形式上，这限制了政治权力在法律范围内的行使，提供了对政治权力的性质和限制的说明(Ashcraft, 1999)。虽然有些人可能会说，这赋予了人们反抗任何事物的权利，但洛克认为，人们不太可能轻易反抗政府的形式，因为他们不希望“摆脱旧的形式”(T II.xix.223)。因此，人们在尝试抵抗之前需要“普遍受到虐待”(T II.xix.224)。邓恩进一步扩展了这一观点，他认为，当人们出于对安全的渴望而加入社会契约时，他们会接受统治者的微小不公。只有在一种毁灭性的力量下，人民才会行使他们的反抗权利。洛克对反抗、反抗和暴政等主题的扩展为革命提供了正当的理由，同时也描绘了国家的性质和作用。他对这些思想的关注是他的历史背景和政治信仰的产物。然而，需要注意的是，最终的同意，政治义务，抵抗和财产都是洛克论点的关键要素，因为它们都是男人自我保护的必要条件。
英国巴斯大学论文代写:暴君
Locke argues that resistance is acceptable when the king becomes a tyrant (Ashcraft, 1980, 1999). Tyranny occurs when the ruler ‘makes not the Law, but his Will, the Rule’, directing his actions and political power towards personal aims, rather than in promoting the common good (TII.xviii.199).The tyrant uses ‘force without Authority’, de facto exceeding the limits of the law . Formally, this bounds the exercise of political authority within the law, providing an account of political power’s nature and limits (Ashcraft, 1999). While some might argue that this gives a right to people to resist anything, Locke argues that people are not likely to easily resist forms of government, as they do not wish to get “out of their old Forms” (T II.xix.223). Therefore, people need to be “generally ill treated” before they attempt resistance (T II.xix.224). This is further expanded by Dunn, who argues that, as men enter the social contract based on a desire of security, they will accept small injustices from the ruler. Only in a destructive power, people will exercise their right to resistance .Locke’s expansion on themes as resistance, rebellion and tyranny provide the rightful justification for revolution, while delineating the nature and roles of the state. His focus on these ideas is product of his historical background and political beliefs. Nevertheless, it is to note that ultimately consent, political obligation, resistance and property are all crucial elements in Locke’s argument as they are all necessary in men’s self-protection.
