英国社会学essay代写 殖民主义
Keywords:英国社会学essay代写 殖民主义
殖民主义的历史遗留问题是造成土著人不遵守偷猎执法的另一个因素。殖民主义为了保护欧洲人的运动狩猎,强行剥夺了土著人的狩猎权,使土著人口进一步贫困化;因此,一些土著人认为,"他们有权获得和使用野生动物,就像他们世世代代所做的那样"(Duffy)。政府和当地社区之间缺乏沟通,导致双方多次发生冲突,这种观点的差异进一步加深。当当地社区感觉到自己与严格执行反偷猎政策有疏离时,就会形成不同的观点,"通过更多使用武器、射杀、扩大护林员数量、将反偷猎外包给私营部门,[以及]更多使用新技术"(Duffy),这可能在短期内看似有效,但从长远来看却会产生反作用。此外,产权不明确,以及精英阶层制定的政策 "很少听取土著社区的意见"(Haas)导致的野生动物冲突,促使当地人参与犯罪组织招募的偷猎活动。根据华盛顿特区国务院外交事务人员Fenio的说法,"缺乏感知到的机会已经转化为对公园官员的愤怒,对一些人来说,渴望保护非法猎人","土著人受到不公正的惩罚--双方之间的信任和互动,而不是执法,导致预防,而不是严格执法。因此,建立信任,确定共同的目标,鼓励双方有意义的互动,"是在不确定的情况下成功地跨学科解决问题的关键" .
英国社会学essay代写 殖民主义
The historical legacy of colonialism is another factor that contributes to the natives’ noncompliance with enforcement on poaching. Colonialism forcefully eliminated the natives’ rights to hunt in order to protect the sports-hunting of Europeans, further impoverishing the indigenous population; therefore, some natives believe that “they have a right to access and use wildlife as they have done for generations” (Duffy). This difference in viewpoint is further deepened from the lack of communication between the government and local communities, causing the two parties to clash repeatedly. Distinct standpoints develop when local communities feel alienated from the strict enforcement of anti-poaching policies “via greater use of arms, shoot to kill, expansion of ranger numbers, contracting anti-poaching out to the private sector, [and] more use of new technologies” (Duffy) which may seem effective in the short run but are counterproductive in the long run. Additionally, unclear property rights, as well as wildlife conflict resulting from policies made by the elite “with little input from indigenous communities” (Haas) has motivated natives to participate in poaching from recruitment by criminal organizations. According to Fenio, the Foreign Affairs Personnel at the Department of State in Washington DC, “A lack of perceived opportunities has translated into anger toward park officials and, for some, a desire to protect illegal hunters”Natives are unjustly punished- trust and interactions between both parties, not enforcement, leads to prevention, not strict enforcement. Therefore, establishing trust, identifying common goals, and encouraging meaningful interaction between the two parties “are key to successful transdisciplinary problem-solving in the face of uncertainty”
本段内容来自网络 并不是我们的写手作品 请勿直接剽窃,查重100%,造成后果与本站无关。如需定制论文请记得联系我们。