英国布莱顿论文代写:手指运动

Keywords:英国布莱顿论文代写

最近的研究表明，用手写字有助于保持信息，这与手工绘制的字母需要几个连续的手指运动（包括大脑的多个区域），而不是单键盘敲击有关。你是否经常听到有人说（或说你自己）：“如果我要记住，我必须把它写下来”，然而，一些尊敬的学者，如语言学家Dennis Baron，反对手写。在他的书中，“更好的铅笔：读者、作家和数字革命，”他比较反对在教室里电脑的焦虑和愤怒，往往是新技术的引进（thierer）。印刷机，他说，被描述为破坏”几乎是精神上的联系”的作家和页面之间；打字机被认为“客观、吵闹”相比，书法艺术（thierer）。45个州的辩论工资通过了不包括草书的2014的课程指导方针，但学生在小学毕业时确实需要键盘熟练，”（科伊尔）。如果研究发现草书有很多好处，我不明白为什么更多的教育者和家长不努力恢复这种技能回到美国的学校系统中去。一个第九年级的老师说，许多美国人都不知道，今天的“现代的年轻人不知道如何读或写草书（arcomano）。大多数家长对他们的学生不知道如何读草书这一事实一无所知，这是真的吗？当孩子们想了解他们的祖先，他们发现的唯一的文件是用草书书写的时候会发生什么？我发现了许多论坛和文章，他们认为孩子们有朝一日无法阅读美国宪法。但是我们必须看到更大的画面。美国儿童正在失去帮助他们的大脑、运动技能和情绪发展的一项重要技能。
英国布莱顿论文代写:手指运动
Recent research suggests that writing by hand helps one retain information, something to do with the fact that a letter drawn by hand requires several sequential finger movements (involving multiple regions of the brain) as opposed to a single keyboard tap. How often have you heard someone say (or said yourself): "If I'm going to remember that I'll have to write it down." Nevertheless, some respected academics such as linguist Dennis Baron argue against handwriting. In his book, "A Better Pencil: Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution," he compares the reaction against computers in the classroom to the anxiety and outrage that often follows the introduction of new technology (Thierer). The printing press, he says, was described as disrupting the "almost spiritual connection" between writer and page; the typewriter was considered "impersonal and noisy" as compared to the art of handwriting (Thierer). A debate wages as 45 states adopt school curriculum guidelines for 2014 that exclude cursive handwriting, but do require keyboard proficiency by the time students exit elementary school," (Coyle). If research is finding that cursive handwriting has many benefits, I do not understand why more educators and parents are not making efforts to reinstate this skill back into America's school systems. A ninth grade teacher said that many Americans are not aware that today's' modern youth do not know how to read or write cursive (Arcomano). Could it be true that the majority of parents are clueless to the fact that their student(s) do not know how to read cursive? What will happens when children want to learn about their ancestors and the only documents they find are written in cursive? I found many forums and articles that argue that children will not be able to read the U.S. Constitution some day. But we must look at the bigger picture. American children are losing an important skill that helps their brains, motor skills and emotions develop.