英国金斯顿大学代写:请求宽恕

Keywords:英国金斯顿大学代写:请求宽恕

被人憎恨，默索尔特保留了他的个性。如果默索出去请求宽恕，他就会成为集体的一员。最后一个主题是反思。它指的是将我们没有意识到的事物带入意识的能力。默索过着一种前反思的生活。他每天都要经历各种各样的事情，每一刻都是如此的专注，以至于他从来没有反思过这些事情。默索这样做，直到他在监狱里第一次看到自己的影子。默索特看着自己，展示了他从前反思到反思的转变。他开始意识到他所不知道的事情。《陌生人》的主题是生活是荒谬的。理性无法解释人性。默索尔特荒谬的信念是生命是无意义的，没有目的的。这种无意义意味着我们的生活没有任何明显的意义。这是无法解释的，因为没有人可以解释别人对生活的意义感或无意义感。加缪的《陌生人》展现了墨索特的性格，他杀死一个阿拉伯人后被判处死刑。这种冲突描绘了社会道德与默索的明显缺失之间的鲜明对比;他被判处死刑，不是因为杀害阿拉伯人，而是因为拒绝符合社会标准。对默索责任的论述发生在小说的最后。莫索特执行象征性地带来了情感,莫索特面临他的虚无和不可能证明不道德的选择他,他意识到他生命的纯粹偶然性,并表示他已无效,本质上,他自己的存在无法接受的风险和责任的个人自由存在主义的现实需要。Meursault从不为自己的行为负责，他所做的只是希望自己的生活能回到过去。默索是社会中的异类;他不能直接与他人交往，因为他不像他们那样生活。他不能像世界其他地方的人一样遵守同样的道德约束，因为他没有把握住它们;他对周围发生的事情漠不关心。默索特的整个生命是冷静的。他从吃喝、抽烟、坐在阳台上获得某种程度的快乐。然而所有这些东西都是触觉的;Meursault从他们身上获得生理上的满足，但是没有情感的依附。这与社会形成了鲜明对比，社会对是非的严格规定取决于个人对这些概念的认识。
英国金斯顿大学代写:请求宽恕
By being hated Meursault retains his individuality. If Meursault goes out there begging for forgiveness he would just become a member of a collectivity. The final theme is reflection. It refers to the capacity to bring that which we are unaware of into awareness. Meursault leads a pre-reflective life. He goes through his daily events and is so absorbed in each moment that he never reflects on them. Meursault does this until he looks at a reflection of himself for the first time in prison. Meursault looking at himself shows his transition from pre-reflective to reflective. He begins to become aware of what he was unaware of. The main theme in The Stranger is that life is absurd. Reason is incapable of explaining human nature. Meursault’s absurd beliefs are that life is meaningless and without purpose. The meaninglessness implies absence of any obvious meaning to our life. This cannot be explained, because no one can explain someone else’s sense of meaning or meaninglessness towards life. Camus’ The Stranger presents the character of Meursault who, after killing an Arab, is sentenced to death. This conflict portrays the stark contrast between the morals of society and Meursault’s evident lack of them; he is condemned to death, less for the Arab’s murder, than for refusing to conform to society’s standards. The discussion of Meursault’s responsibility takes place at the end of the novel. Meursault’s execution symbolically brings forth emotion, as Meursault confronts his nothingness and the impossibility of justifying the immoral choices he has made, he realizes the pure contingency of his life, and that he has voided, in essence, his own existence by failing to accept the risk and responsibility that the personal freedom of an existentialist reality entails. Meursault never really takes responsibility for his actions, all Meursault does is wish that his life could go back to the way it used to be. Meursault is an anomaly in society; he cannot relate directly to others because he does not live as they do. He cannot abide by the same moral confines as the rest of the world because he does not grasp them; he is largely indifferent to events occurring around him. Meursault’s entire being is unemotional. He derives a certain level of pleasure from eating and drinking, smoking cigarettes, sitting on his balcony. Yet all these things are tactile; Meursault derives physical satisfaction from them, but there is no emotion attached. This is in direct contrast to society, whose strict guidelines focusing on right and wrong depend on an individual’s sense of these concepts.