英国金斯顿大学代写:善意行事
Keywords:英国金斯顿大学代写:善意行事
康德认为，道德是建立在意图之上的，而不是那些行为的结果。带着善意行事就是带着对他人的责任行事，当然，这是通过理性的结论得出的，这种责任是道德的。康德认为，这是全面善的基础。他强调了一个事实，“一个人不能用行动来判断一个存在是好是坏，因为有时一些好的行为可能是犯下邪恶行为的途径”(Smith, 2010)。例如，把你的钱或财产捐给别人可以被认为是一件好事或有价值的事。然而，如果这种捐赠实际上是为了在社区中获得更高的知名度，或者是为了向政府隐瞒资源，那么这种看似好的行为就会遭到破坏。行动的好坏取决于个人的意图，而不是结果。连接因此可以使康德特征固有的善意,这意味着如果一个人有纯粹的意图的毕业典礼活动,那么无论这个活动的结果,个体将被认为是好的和顺从的,他们已经删除了“经验自我”的决定(施罗德,2005年第3期)。绝对命令因此给我们的能力来决定如果一个动作是一个道德或不道德的,它告诉我们,让我们的决定不是我们的欲望或预期的结果,这将是假设的,但做决定是正确的,道德或绝对命令(史密斯,2010)。这不是一个简单的答案，因为绝对命令是一种引导我们做出决策的方式，这种决策被考虑，需要我们评估我们做出这些决策的动机。
英国金斯顿大学代写:善意行事
To Kant, morality is based on the intent not on the action or outcomes of those actions. Acting with good will is acting with duty to others, through of course the reasoned conclusion that this duty is moral. According to Kant, this was the foundation of overall good. He highlighted the fact that “one cannot use action to judge whether a being was good or bad because sometimes some good actions may be an avenue for committing evil acts” (Smith, 2010). For example, to donate your money or possessions to others could be considered a good or worthy deed. However, if that donation is actually done to gain a heightened profile in the community or to hide resources from the government, then this will undermine the seemingly good act. Whether or not the action is good comes down to the intent of the individual, not the outcome. The connection can therefore be made that Kant characterized inherent good as good will, meaning that if one has pure intentions at the commencement of an activity, then no matter the result of that activity, the individual would be considered to be good and duteous, as they have removed “empirical ego” from the decision (Schroeder, 2005, p.19). The categorical imperative therefore gives us the ability to decide if an action is a moral or immoral one, in that it tells us to make our decisions not on our desires or expected outcomes, which would be hypothetical, but by making a decision which is the right, moral or categorical imperative (Smith, 2010). This is not a simple answer, as the categorical imperative is a way of leading us to decision making which is considered and which demands we assess our motivations for those decisions.
