英国金斯顿大学代写:道德和法律分析
Keywords:英国金斯顿大学代写:道德和法律分析
选择这个案例进行道德和法律分析，不仅仅是因为它引人注目。在这种情况下，可以确定许多行动者，为通过伦理框架的方向对伦理问题进行实用分析提供坚实的基础。在这种情况下，主要参与者是Gary McKinnon和负责安全的网络管理员。次要的参与者被确定为RemotelyAnywhere软件的制造商，该软件使麦金农能够如此轻松地控制机器，以及存储在那里的网络和数据的所有者美国军方。同样，这些行动者为确定案例研究中固有的法律问题提供了基础。有足够的证据表明，本案的两个主要参与者都违反了法律。技术跨越数字时代，世界的另一端触手可及，仅仅40亿个IP地址并不能满足我们的需求。基于这个原因，我们不得不感到黑客案件的规模和/或频率只会增加，也许加里·麦金农案在未来会被超越。乍一看，这个案件似乎是一个典型的黑客案件，犯罪的人纯粹是出于个人原因进行欺诈或以其他方式获取不属于他们的东西。然而，这个案子的不同之处在于，没有理由相信麦金农的行为是为了拿走任何不是他的东西，或者从他的行为中获得任何个人利益。反对麦金农行为的是那些对网络安全和拥有网络的人。
英国金斯顿大学代写:道德和法律分析
This case study has been chosen for ethical and legal analysis not just for its high profile. Numerous actors can be identified in this case to provide a solid base to apply a pragmatic analysis of ethical issues though the direction of ethical frameworks. Primary actors in this case are identified as the Gary McKinnon and the network administrators responsible for security. Secondary actors have been identified as the makers of RemotelyAnywhere, the software which allowed McKinnon to control machines so easily and the US military who were the owners of the networks and data stored there. Similarly, these actors provide a basis to identify legal issues inherent within the case study. There are sufficient suggestions to argue that laws have been broken by both primary actors in this case.Technology strides on through the digital age where the other side of the world is accessible at our fingertips and a mere four billion IP addresses are not fulfilling needs. For this reason, it cannot be helped but to feel that hacking cases will only increase in scale and/or frequency and perhaps the Gary McKinnon case will be surpassed in the future.At first glance this case appears to be a typical hacking case, where the person committing the offence is acting for purely personal reasons to commit fraud or otherwise take something which isn’t theirs to take. However this case differs in that there is no reason to believe that McKinnon was acting with the intent to take anything which was not his or to gain any personal advantage from his actions. Actors objecting to McKinnon’s actions are those who were responsible for the security of the network and those who owned the network.
