英国莱斯特法学作业代写:腐败

Keywords:英国莱斯特法学作业代写:腐败

丹麦和新加坡采用了不同于缅甸和伊拉克的方法，他们的方法来打击本国的腐败，这是这两个国家腐败率相对较低的主要原因。他们在所采用的每一种方法、执行方式和所进行活动的结果中使用了标准。所给出的类型、规范和示例值得一看。在丹麦，领导人是非制度化的，其特点是追随者的自发性。它采取高度情绪化和道德立场反对腐败。新加坡以改变各种制度的参与者的价值观为目标。事实上，在他们执行的方法中，重点是道德和法律，没有规定有效的技术、法律和官僚手段来打击腐败。这些国家还强调利用体制手段来实现既定目标，包括立法措施、反腐败机构和反腐败运动，以确保公众在打击腐败方面的合作。这种方法由其社会中强大的统治者领导，利用宪法、法律、组织和程序手段来实现一个非常高的层次的目标;消除或根除腐败.
英国莱斯特法学作业代写:腐败
Denmark and Singapore employed different approaches from Myanmar and Iraq, their approaches to combat corruption in their country this is the main reason why there is very relatively small rate of corruption in these two countries. They used criteria in each approaches employed, manner of implementation, and results of the activities undertaken. The typologies and the specifications and examples given are worth looking at. In Denmark, leaders are being non institutional, characterized by spontaneity among adherents. It takes highly emotional and moralistic stance against corruption. Singapore value changes in actors of various institutions as a goal. In fact, in the approaches they implemented, the emphasis is on moral and legal, there is no provision for effective technical, legal and bureaucratic means in combating the corruption. These countries also emphasizes the use of institutional means to achieve stated goals, including legislative measures, anti-corruption bureaus and anti -corruption campaigns aimed at securing the cooperation of the public in the drive of corruption. This approach is led by their powerful rulers in their society and utilizes constitutional legal, organizational and procedural means to achieve a very high level goal; the elimination or eradication of corruption